Criminal Liability of Perpetrators of Embezzlement in Office within a Limited Liability Company

Authors

  • I Komang Jemi Agus Wijaya Universitas Terbuka Author
  • M. Albarade Umaru Jaya Universitas Terbuka Author
  • M. Sandy Firliano Universitas Terbuka Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/

Keywords:

embezzlement, office, criminal liability, limited liability company, corporate law

Abstract

Embezzlement in office is a criminal offense that frequently occurs in the corporate world, particularly within Limited Liability Companies (PT). This crime involves individuals within the company who abuse their position or the trust granted to them to unlawfully appropriate the company’s assets. Under Indonesian criminal law, embezzlement in office is regulated under Article 374 of the Criminal Code (KUHP). This journal aims to examine the forms of legal responsibility imposed on perpetrators of embezzlement in office within a PT, as well as the possibility of corporate criminal liability. The research method used is normative juridical, employing a statutory and case study approach. The results of the study indicate that perpetrators of embezzlement in office bear personal criminal liability; however, under certain conditions, the corporation itself may also be held criminally liable if the offense is committed on behalf of or for the benefit of the company.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)

Undang-Undang No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas

Muladi & Barda Nawawi Arief. (2010). Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana.

Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

R. Soesilo. (1996). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana serta Komentar- komentarnya. Jakarta: Politeia.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 2049 K/Pid/2012

Andi Hamzah. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Downloads

Published

01.07.2025